Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2026 DAILYLAW 6042 (RAJ)
ROHIT JHALANI S/O SHRI BANWARI LAL JHALANI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2138/2026 · 2026-04-17
Uma Shanker Vyas
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6042 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6042 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16308] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2138/2026 Rohit Jhalani S/o Shri Banwari Lal Jhalani, Aged About 48 Years, R/o D-151, Bapu Nagar, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Sonakshi Jain W/o Dr. Satish Jain, Aged About 49 Years, R/o C-20, Near New Vidhan Sabha, Pankaj Singhvi Marg, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Lokesh Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. Harsh Joshi, Adv. & Mr. Chinmaya Mudggal, Adv. for Mr. Deepak Chauhan, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 17/04/2026 ;g ;kfpdk /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk T;ksfr uxj] t;iqj nf{k.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 50@2026 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 318¼4½ ch-,u-,l- dks fujLr djus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDr rFkk fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh@ihfMr@vkgrx.k }kjk la;qDr :i ls ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd i{kdkjksa ds chp esa vkilh LoSfPNd lgefr ds vk/kkj ij jkthukek gks pqdk gSA nksuksa i{kksa ds chp lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k gSa] vijk/k t?kU; o xaHkhj izd`fr dk ugha gS] vr% mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ o mlds vk/kkj ij lafLFkr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks vikLr fd;k tkosA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk fof/k&lEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA muds }kjk rF;kRed fjiksVZ izLrqr dh x;h] ftlds lkFk
[2026:RJ-JP:16308] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2138/2026] iqfyl ds le{k vfHk;qDr o vkgrx.k@ihfMr@ifjoknh }kjk izLrqr jkthukes dks rLnhd dj izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftls vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkrk gSA orZeku ekeys esa vijk/k xaHkhj o t?kU; izd`fr dk ugha gSA i{kdkjku~ ds e/; lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k LFkkfir gks pqds gSa] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vuqla/kku vFkok vfHk;kstu dks fujUrj j[ks tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gS] vr% ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fu.kZ; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. 2012(10) SCC 303 esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj gksdj mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ij ntZ vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSA ifj.kker% vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk ;kphx.k ds fo:) iqfyl Fkkuk T;ksfr uxj] t;iqj nf{k.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 50@2026 dh lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Murari Lal Sharma /44