Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 604 (JHR)

RAJESH NAMTA ALIAS RAJESH NAMATA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1586/2026 · 2026-03-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:6377 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1586 of 2026 ------ Rajesh Namta @ Rajesh Namata, aged about 26 years, son of Naresh Namta, Resident of Damcolony, Ghodangi, Post Chandil, Police Station-Chandil, District Seraikella Kharsawan. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-11-03-2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner files the supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ichagarh P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4) & 311 of the B.N.S., 2023 and subsequently, cognizance has been taken of the offences punishable under Sections 310(2), 115(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 25 (1-B)(a), 26 & 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted bag with some money. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner was put under T.I. Parade but the witnesses have not identified the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.10.2025 as is evident from para-12 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb any of the witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Chandil in connection with Ichagarh P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb any of the witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 11/03/2026 Abhiraj/