SUNIL KHAN S/O SHRI SHABBIR KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3500/2026 · 2026-04-02
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6037 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6037 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13853] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3500/2026 Sunil Khan S/o Shri Shabbir Khan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Near Kanya Pathshala Nehru Park, Moji Ki Bagichi Station Road Maniya, Police Thana Maniya District Dholpur. (The Accused Confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 02/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 547/2025 registered at Police Station Mania, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 109(1) BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is behind the bars since 15.02.2026. He also submits that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner is proposed to be filed. He further submits that injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life. He further submits that the petitioner and the injured are the real brothers. He further submits that there is no criminal antecedent against the accused-
[2026:RJ-JP:13853] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3500/2026] petitioner and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 15.02.2026; injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life; there is no criminal antecedent against the accused-petitioner and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sunil Khan S/o Shri Shabbir Khan is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
[2026:RJ-JP:13853] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3500/2026]
7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /73