IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Petition No.168 of 2026 Decided on: 23rd March, 2026 Chand Lal .......Petitioner versus The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr.Om Parkash Goel, Advocate. For the respondent: Ms. Maheshwari Sharma, Advocate. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Ms. Maheshwari Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation has produced communication dated 23.03.2026 issued by the authorized signatory of the respondent-Corporation. The same is taken on record. 2. A perusal of the communication reveals that the petitioner has been paid an amount of Rs.32,927/-. In view of this, the execution petition is closed. However, in case directions contained in CWP No.4388 of 2024, titled, Chand Lal vs. HPTDC Limited, have not been fully complied with, the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh execution petition. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 3. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) March 23, 2026 Judge (naveen)