Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6036 (UTT)

JAMUNA PRASAD GUPTA v. SARDAR SATYENDRA SINGH

WPMS/1518/2026 · 2026-05-26

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4182 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No. 1518 of 2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. T.A. Khan, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Mohd. Shafy, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By the instant petition the petitioner is praying for the following relief: “To issue suitable directions to the court of Prescribed Authority (Civil Judge), Haldwani, District Nainital to decide the Rent Control Case No. 08 of 2022, expeditiously within the stipulated time period more particularly within a period of three months.” 3. The relief as sought appears to be innocuous. 4. In such view of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally with the direction to the Prescribed Authority (Civil Judge), Haldwani, District Nainital to decide the Rent Control Case No. 08 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible preferably within four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 5. It is made clear while expediting the proceeding the Prescribed Authority shall not grant any unnecessary adjournment to either of the party. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 26.05.2026 PR 2026:UHC:4182