Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6036 (KAR)

NASIR HYDER @ NASIR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/5018/2026 · 2026-02-19

B M Shyam Prasad

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10655 WP No. 5018 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5018 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: NASIR HYDER @ NASIR S/O SHIEK BAHADUR, AGE 39 YEARS, R/AT NO 6/2, 3RD CROSS, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, BENGALURU-33. (CTP 14784, PRESENTLY ON PAROLE) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH R.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AND PRISON, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10655 WP No. 5018 of 2026 PARAPPANA AGRAHARA, BENGALURU 560 100. 3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND INSPECTOR, GENERAL OF PRISON AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, NO.04, SESHADRI ROAD, BENGALURU 560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B. RAVINDRANATH., AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER AND GRANT EXTENSION OF PAROLE TO THE PETITIONER, NAMELY V. NASIR HYDER AT NASIR (CTP NO. 14784), IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA PRISONS RULES AND ON HUMANITARIAN AND MEDICAL GROUNDS; B) DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONTINUE/EXTEND THE EMERGENCY PAROLE ALREADY GRANTED TO THE PETITIONER FOR SUCH FURTHER PERIOD. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10655 WP No. 5018 of 2026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER This Court on 03.02.2026 in W.P.No. 36349/2025 has admitted the petitioner's husband to Emergency Parole for 15 days with the petitioner contending that her father-in-law is hospitalized. The present application is filed for extension of this Emergency Parole. This Court, upon hearing Sri Girish R, the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri B.Ravindranath, the learned Additional Government Advocate, opines that if the petitioner could make out a case for Emergency/General Parole [or extension of parole now permitted] must necessarily surrender and then make an application with the authorities for due consideration in - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10655 WP No. 5018 of 2026 accordance with the Karnataka Prisons and Correctional Services Manual 2021. With such liberty, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE NV