Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6036 (JHR)

SHIVASHIS KASHYAP @ SHIVASHISH KASHYAP @ SHIBU MISHRA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3029/2026 · 2026-04-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:10867] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3029 of 2026 ------ Shivashis Kashyap @ Shivashish Kashyap @ Shibu Mishra aged about 30 years, S/o Late Girdhari Nath Mishra having his residence at village- Shyama Charan Mishra Lane, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District- Deoghar .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Parth Jalan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-16-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar Town P.S. Case No.230 of 2025 (S.T. Case No.231 of 2025) registered for the offences punishable under Section 126 (2), 115 (2), 351 (4), 352, 308 (5), 111 (4), 109 (1) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant and demanded extortion of Rs.10,00,000/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that in the meanwhile only one witness i.e., the P.W.1 has been examined by the prosecution but he has neither stated anything to implicate the petitioner in this case nor has he identified the petitioner. It is further submitted that the main allegation is against the co-accused Saurabh Kaware, Jaygiri and Rajan Singh. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.05.2025 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Town P.S. Case No.230 of 2025 (S.T. Case No.231 of 2025) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-16.04.2026-Animesh/