(TM) A No.48 of 2026 __________ Page No.1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-08-2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE (TM) A.No.48 of 2026 and (T)OP(TM) No.452 of 2023 M/s. Bunge India Private Limited 601C and 601D, 6th Floor, The capital, C-70, G Block, Bandra Kurla complex, Bandra East, Mumbai 400051. (Represented by its Power Agent Tanushree Goyal) ..Petitioner Vs 1. M/s.Hatsun Agro Product Limited Domaine, Rajiv Gandhi Salai ( OMR) Karapakkam, Chennai - 600097, Tamil Nadu. 2. The Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade Marks Registry, Intellectual Property Rights Building, Industrial Estate, SIDCIO RMD Godown Area, G.S.T. Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. ..Respondents PRAYER: Trade Marks Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of original Side Rules, read with Order IX Rule 9 of the Code of Civil procedure, 1908 to restore the petition (T)OP(TM) NO. 452/2023 which was dismissed for default. For Petitioner: M/s. Sheetal Vohra For Respondents: Mr.G.Kalyan Jhabakh for R-1 M/s.Ravimeenakshisundaram, SPC for R-2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis (TM) A No.48 of 2026 __________ Page No.2 of 4 O R D E R Trade Marks Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules, read with Order IX Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is filed to restore the petition (T)OP(TM) No.452/2023 which was dismissed for default by this Court, vide order dated 25.03.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that when the matter came up for hearing on 25.03.2026, due to inadvertent administrative lapse of noting down the correct hearing date, the matter was not properly reflected in the cause list records maintained by the petitioner. The non-appearance of the petitioner on the said date of hearing, was neither wilful or wanton and the same happened as the petitioner was under the bona fide impression that the matter was not listed on that day. Hence, the learned counsel prayed for allowing the present restoration petition. 3. The learned counsel for the first respondent, raised no objections to the present restoration petition. He also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis (TM) A No.48 of 2026 __________ Page No.3 of 4 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made, this (TM) A.No.48 of 2026 filed seeking restoration of (T)OP(TM) NO.452/2023, is allowed. 20-08-2026 sts To: The Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade Marks Registry, Intellectual Property Rights Building, Industrial Estate, SIDCIO RMD Godown Area, G.S.T. Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis (TM) A No.48 of 2026 __________ Page No.4 of 4 DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE J. sts Order made in (TM) A.No.48 of 2026 and (T)OP(TM) No.452 of 2023 Dated: 20-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis