CRL OP No. 23254 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH CRL OP No. 23254 of 2026 Dineshkumar S/o.Senthilathiban, No.14, Sigma Flats, G-2, Nanganallur, 6th Main Road, Mohanarangam Main Road, Alandur Taluk, Chennai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police Palavanthangal Police Station, Chennai District. Crime No.178 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation of the case in Crime No.178 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.P.Muthamizhselvakumar For Respondent: Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.07.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 278 and 123 of the BNS Act, 2023 in Crime No.178 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 23254 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner were found in illegal possession of 108 Tapentadol- 100 mg tablets and 8 unused syringes. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that this petitioner is in custody since 04.07.2026 and he has no previous case pending against him and he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that this petitioner is found in illegal possession of 108 Tapentadol- 100 mg tablets (10 strips of 10 tablets each and 1 strip of 8 tablets) and 8 unused syringes and the same were recovered. On enquiry, it is revealed that the petitioner procured the said tablets through online courier from Gujarat and used to dissolved the tablets in water and administer the same to the customers through syringes for the purpose of intoxication by receiving money. There are no previous case pending against him. However, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 23254 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); the period of incarceration of the petitioner since 04.07.2026 and and there are no previous case pending against him, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court-II, Alandur, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 23254 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 20-08-2026 GV Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 23254 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1. The learned Judicial Magistrate Court-II, Alandur 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai. 3. The Inspector of Police, Palavanthangal Police Station, Chennai District. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 23254 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 N.RAMESH, J. GV CRL OP No. 23254 of 2026 20-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis