Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010181622025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1077/2026 SMTI RUNU KONWAR HANDIQUE W/O SRI PUNYESWAR KONWAR VILL - MAHARA GOHAIN GAON P.O. P.S. - NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST. - LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 2: SRI PUNYESWAR KONWAR S/O LATE JOGESWAR KONWAR 1. VILL - MAHARA GOHAIN GAON P.O. P.S. - NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST. - LAKHIMPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI G. S. ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI - 7 REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER GUWAHATI REGIONAL OFFICE ULUBARI GUWAHATI-7 2:SMTI BINA TARANGPI KALITA (OWNER) W/O- RABIN KALITA R/O- WARD NO.-10 MILAN NAGAR P/O P/S- NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST.- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM. PIN- 787001 3:SRI BIRAJ KALITA (DRIVER) S/O- LATE RABIN KALITA R/O- WARD NO.-10 Page No.# 2/3 MILAN NAGAR P/O P/S- NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST.- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM. PIN-787001 ------------ Advocate for : MR. M K NEOG Advocate for : MS. R D MOZUMDAR appearing for THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD IN MACApp. Case No. 120/2026 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 14.05.2026 [1] Heard Mr. S.K. Singha, the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. R.D. Mozumdar, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents/insurance company. [2] This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant/claimant praying for a direction to the respondents/insurance company for depositing the entire awarded amount before the Registry of this court and release the same to the applicant. [3] Ms. R.D. Mozumdar, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents/insurance company has submitted that though the insurance company has filed an interlocutory application, i.e. I.A. (Civil) No. 1098/2026, praying for stay of the execution of the impugned judgment and award, however, the insurance company is presently not pressing for the said stay Page No.# 3/3 application. [4] Under such circumstances, there is no bar for the claimant/applicant going for execution of the impugned judgment and award before the executing court and hence, this interlocutory application is not maintainable at this stage. [5] This interlocutory application is, accordingly, disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant