M/S RASHIDULLAH KHAN v. SOUTH-EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
WPC/594/2026 · 2026-04-12
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6034 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6034 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:16863-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 594 of 2026 1 - M/s Rashidullah Khan Through Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Anjar Ali Khan S/o Rashidullah Khan Aged - 41 Years, R/o House No. 110, Kasimpara, Behind Central School, Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - South-East Central Railway Through General Manager New Zonal Building, Bilaspur, C.G. 2 - Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer (C & W) Office Of Divisional Railway Manager, Bilaspur Division, South-East Central Railway Bilaspur, C.G. 3 - Senior Coaching Depot Officer Office Of Divisional Railway Manager, Bilaspur Division, South-East Central Railway, Bilaspur, C.G. 4 - Principal Chief Mechanical Engineer Office Of Divisional Railway Manager, Bilaspur Division, South- East Central Railway Bilaspur, C.G.
... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Sidhath Shukla, Advocate, appears through virtual mode. For Respondents : Ms. Sweta Rai on behalf of Shri Ramakant Mishra, Dy. Solicitor General. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, CJ Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 13.04.2026 INDRAJEET SAHU Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2026.04.15 10:22:02 +0530
2 Per,
Ramesh Sinha, CJ.
1 The petitioner has filed this petition seeking following reliefs:
“i. To Set aside and Quash Tender Notice No: 19-Mech-BSP- CAMC-Operation-Laundry, Date: 24.01.2026 floated by the Respondents and subsequent proceedings. II. To Direct the Respondents to execute Supplementary Agreement with the Petitioner in terms of Letter dated 15th December 2025. iii. Pass any other relief order or direction, as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstance of the case and in the interest of justice.” 2 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would fairly submit that Notice Inviting Tender in question has subsequently been withdrawn and the petition has now become infructuous. 3 Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
(Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice inder