Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 60291 (MAD)

Ms Athani Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Limited K 392 v. The Superintendent of GST

WP/28830/2026 · 2026-08-13

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 28830 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 28830 of 2026 & WMP Nos.31602 & 31603 of 2026 Ms Athani Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Limited K 392 Represented by its Secretary Mr. T. Madhappan, No.266/1, Athani Primary Co-operative Society, Kamarajar Salai, Athani, Erode District Tamilnadu 638 502 GSTIN 33AACAA3570G2Z5 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of GST Office of the Superintendent of Goods and services Tax and Central Excise, Gobichettiypalayam Range, 21-B-17, First Floor, Modachur Road Opp. HDFC Bank Gobichettipalayam, TamilNadu-638 476 2. The Assistant Commissioner Bhavani Jurisdiction, Erode, Tamilnadu ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 1st Respondent herein in its Impugned order in Original No 07/2023 -GST SUPDT in Din No 20231259XP0000613736 dated 20.12.2023, along with the 2nd Respondent Consequential order in Form GST DRC-07 bearing Reference No.ZD3304242579067 dated 30.04.2024 for the tax period July 2017- March 2020, and quash the same. __________ Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28830 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Ms. R. Hemalatha For Respondent(s): Mr. Su. Srinivasan, Senior Standing Counsel Mr. J. Hari Krishnan, Junior Standing Counsel ORDER Order dated 20.12.2023 rejecting the input tax credit (ITC) claim of the petitioner on the ground of belated filing of returns under Section 16(4) of applicable GST enactments is challenged in this writ petition. 2. Adverting to the impugned order, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that returns were filed within the extended period specified in subsection (5) of Section 16 of applicable GST enactments. 3. Mr.Su.Srinivasan, learned senior standing counsel, accepts notice for respondents and submits that Section 16(5) was not in force when the impugned order was issued. 4. Section 16(5) applies with retrospective effect. The dates of filing of returns and paying taxes are captured in the impugned order. These dates are within the extended time limit under Section 16(5). Therefore, the impugned order is set aside. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28830 of 2026 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 13-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KAL To 1.The Superintendent of GST Office of the Superintendent of Goods and services Tax and Central Excise, Gobichettiypalayam Range, 21-B-17, First Floor, Modachur Road Opp. HDFC Bank Gobichettipalayam, Tamil Nadu-638 476 2. The Assistant Commissioner Bhavani Jurisdiction, Erode, Tamilnadu __________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28830 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KAL WP No. 28830 of 2026 & WMP Nos.31602 & 31603 of 2026 13-08-2026 __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 28830 of 2026 To 1. The Superintendent of GST Office of the Superintendent of Goods and services Tax and Central Excise, Gobichettiypalayam Range, 21-B-17, First Floor, Modachur Road Opp. HDFC Bank Gobichettipalayam, TamilNadu-638 476 2. The Assistant Commissioner Bhavani Jurisdiction, Erode, Tamilnadu __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis