( 2026:HHC:13592 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.368 of 2026 Date of decision: 27.04.2026 Prakash Chand ….Petitioner Versus Dr. Gopal Beri ….Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Anita Devi, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. B.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent/State and has placed on record communication dated 22.04.2026 along with office order dated 02.04.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the petitioner has been allowed the benefit of higher pay stage in the concerned level of pay matrix i.e. Rs. 33,400/- vide office order dated 02.04.2026. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, as the judgment under reference has been duly complied with, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge April 27, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2