Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:15960
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3059 of 2026 Devendra Bagga S/o T. R. Bagga Aged About 55 Years Working As Assistant Food Officer, R/o Tiwari Chall Jarhabhatha, Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Upper Secretary Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Block- 2, Third Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shyam Kumar, Advocate For State : Mr. Avinash Singh, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Order on Board 08.04.2026 ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.04.09 11:01:25 +0530
2 Heard.
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-
“10.1 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records from the office of respondents with respect to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider and allow the application/representation filed by the petitioner for promotion (Annexuer P/8) in accordance with law, within stipulated time, preferably within a week, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief(s) that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to grant in the interest of justice.”
2. At the outset learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking direction from respondent no. 3 to consider and take decision on the representations submitted by petitioner on 09.02.2026 and lastly on 02.03.2026 at the earliest, within stipulated time frame.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, he is having no objection.
4. On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage, directing respondent no. 03 to consider and take decision on the pending aforementioned representations vide Annexure P-8 submitted by petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a further period of three months from the date of
3 receipt of the order.
5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu)
Judge alfiza