Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6022 (ALL)

MUKESH SIDDHARTH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/23867/2026 · 2026-09-07

Satya Veer Singh, Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar J Cpc

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 23867 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J. 1. Mr. Aditya Prasad Mishra, learned advocate appearing for petitioner hands up writing dated 1st August, 2026 issued by the police authority, revising the demand to 10%. Mrs. Archana Tyagi, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appears for State. 2. Paragraph 1 from our earlier order dated 17th August, 2026 is reproduced below. "1. Mr. Aditya Prasad Mishra, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client requires security. Respondent no.3 (the Senior Superintendent of Police) by communication dated 20th May, 2026 demanded 100% cost for purpose of providing security to his client. On query Mr. Mishra submits, his client was provided with security and now there has been disruption on demand of cost. He seeks interference. " Petitioner has found his relief. 3. The writ petition is disposed of. September 8, 2026 Jaswant Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Satya Veer Singh,J.) Mukesh Siddharth .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad