SANDEEP ROY S/O SMT. SITA ROY v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
CW/2101/2026 · 2026-03-16
Anuroop Singhi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 602 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 602 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11065] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2101/2026 Sandeep Roy S/o Smt. Sita Roy, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 31, Flat No. G-2, Anandam Housing Society, Kalwar Road, Hathoj, Kalwar Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. Punjab National Bank, Head Office, Plot No. 4, Sector 10, Dwarka, New Delhi-110075, Through Its Chairman.
2. Punjab National Bank, Ground Floor, Plot No. 1 And 2, Peetal Factory Road, Near Peetal Factory, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302016, Through Its Branch Manager
3. The Circle Police Inspector, Cyber Crime Police Station, Thrissur City, Kerala. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jay Bhardwaj Mr. Garvit Saraswat For Respondent(s) : Ms. Devakriti Vashishtha with Ms. Sunita Meena and Mr. Kartikeya Shukla for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Mr. Vikas Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Order 16/03/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, has drawn the attention of this Court to a certificate dated 02.01.2025 issued by SOS Children’s Village India, which is an orphanage home. The said certificate reveals that an amount of Rs.4,25,674/- was credited to the bank account of the petitioner on 30.12.2024 after being transferred by the said SOS Children’s Village India in favour of the petitioner.
[2026:RJ-JP:11065] (2 of 3) [CW-2101/2026]
2. Mr. Vikas Jain, learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that as till now the petitioner has not been able to substantiate the receipt of the said amount, they have instructions to debit freeze the entire account.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent – Bank further submits that they have not been served with a copy of the certificate dated 02.01.2025 and that in the event the said certificate is made available to the bank, the same would be immediately forwarded to the investigating agency, namely the Assistant Commissioner of Police, C-Branch, Thrissur City, on whose instructions the account of the petitioner was frozen so that an appropriate decision can be taken.
4. Taking note of the above, as the sole reason for freezing the bank account of the petitioner was the credit of Rs.4,25,674/-, which as per the respondents was an unusual transaction in comparison to the normal transactions carried out in the bank account of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to submit a copy of the certificate dated 02.01.2025 issued by SOS Children’s Villages India to the respondent – Bank within a period of 7 days from today, who shall forward the same to the investigation agency immediately. The decision with respect to the veracity of the said certificate and de-freezing of the bank account of the petitioner be taken within 15 days thereafter. It is further clarified that in the event no decision is taken by the respondents within the aforesaid period, the respondents shall mandatorily de-freeze the bank account of the petitioner immediately upon expiry of the said period.
[2026:RJ-JP:11065] (3 of 3) [CW-2101/2026]
5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(ANUROOP SINGHI),J VINAY /36