Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 602 (KAR)

NAVEEN D SOUZA v. REENA D SOUZA

MFA/8239/2024 · 2026-02-11

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8239 OF 2024 BETWEEN: NAVEEN D’SOUZA, S/O FRANSIS D’SOUZA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT OLD UPPALLI ROAD, 2ND CROSS, NEAR SHADULI MAZZID, UPPALLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU. ……..Appellant (By SRI.SAIRAM SINGH for BHANDAR and SINGH, Advocates) AND: REENA D’SOUZA, W/O NAVEEN D’SOUZA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, #ADISHAKTHINAGARA, NEAR CHAMUNDESHWARI TEMPLE, RAMPURA POST, CHIKKAMAGALURU. …Respondent This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 55 of Indian Divorce Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated 15.10.2024 MFA.No.8239/2024 -------------------------- 2 passed in M.C.No.16/2022 on the file of the PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, CHIKKAMAGALURU, dismissing the petition filed Under Section 10 of the Divorce Act. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objections. Failure to remove the office objections shall result in dismissal of the aforesaid appeal without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt.11.02.2026 not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : MK R By : NR C By : STE