HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10382 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority is not issuing character certificate to the petitioner despite the fact that petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority for issuance of the same, but till date, no action has been taken on the same. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, we dispose off the writ petition permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, District Mau within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner in the light of judgement of this Court in the case of Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. & Others passed in Writ-C No.718 of 2025. March 19, 2026 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Upadhyay, Ambrish Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Hriday Narayan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad