15-IA-6692-2026.DOC Mayur IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6692 OF 2026 IN FEMA(ST) NO. 38046 OF 2025 Shri D.D.kulkarni …Applicant Versus Union Of India And Anr …Respondents Ms. Fatima Lakdawala, for the Applicant. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. DATED: 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026. PC:- 1. This Interim Application is preferred against the order dated 27th January 2026 passed by the Registrar (Judicial-II) of this Court, whereby the Appeal preferred by the Applicant came to be dismissed, on account of non-removal of office objections. 2. Ms. Fatima Lakdawala, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant, has drawn the attention of the Court to the explanation set out in paragraphs 2 to 4 of the Interim Application, justifying MAYUR KONDIRAM ADANE Digitally signed by MAYUR KONDIRAM ADANE Date: 2026.09.03 15:17:57 +0530 15-IA-6692-2026.DOC the reasons for non-removal of the office objections. The explanation set out therein, in our view, constitute sufficient cause and is accordingly accepted. 3. Learned Counsel for the Applicant further undertakes that the office objections shall be removed within a period of two weeks from today. The said statement is accepted as an undertaking to the Court. Accordingly the order dated 27th January 2026 of the Registrar (Judicial - II) is set aside. 4. Subject to removal of the office objections within the stipulated period, the proceedings, including the Appeal and the Interim Application (ST) No.38045 of 2025 seeking condonation of delay, shall stand restored to the record/file of this Court. 5. This Appeal along with the Interim Application for condonation of delay be listed thereafter. 6. The captioned Interim Application No. 6692 of 2026 stands Disposed of in the above terms. (ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.)