Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6014 (AP)

DEVANABOINA (TADIPARTHI) RAMYA KRISHNA v. DEVANABOINA RAJASEKHAR

FCA/70/2025 · 2026-07-16

Battu Devanand, Sunitha Gandham

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 17.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010288862025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3602] FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 70/2025 Between: 1. DEVANABOINA (TADIPARTHI) RAMYA KRISHNA, W/O DEVANABOINA RAJASEKHAR, D/O. TADIPARTHI RUDRA PRASADA RAO, HINDU, AGED 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO. 29- 21-20, PISAPATIVARI STREET, SURYARAOPET. VIJAYAWADA ...APPELLANT AND 1. DEVANABOINA RAJASEKHAR, S/o. Sivaji, Hindu, aged 33 years. Advocate by Profession, R/o. D.No. 8-55, Talla Rosaiah Street, New Endowment Colony, Besides CNG Petrol Bunk, Kamaiahthopu, Kanuru, Vijayawada ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against ordersmay be pleased to allow the appeal by setting aside the order and decree dated 27.03.2025 passed in F.C.O.P. No. 1817 of 2021 on the file of learned XIV Additional District Judge- cum-Additional Family Court, Vijayawada, and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the operation of the award passed in FCOP No. 2 1817 of 2021 dated 27.03.2025 on the file of the XIV Additional District Judge-cum-Additional Family Court, Vijayawada pending disposal of the main case and to pass such Counsel for the Appellant: 1. ANJANEYA PRASAD CH.B.V.D Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.70 of 2025 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) Sri. Ch.B.V.D. Anjaneya Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he sought permission of the Court to withdraw this Appeal, as per the instructions of his client. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND ___________________________ JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM Date: 17.07.2026 SA Whether the order is : Speaking 𝑌𝑒𝑠 /No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable 𝑌𝑒𝑠 /No 4 𝟐𝟓 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.70 of 2025 Date: 17.07.2026 SA