CRL OP No. 23105 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP No. 23105 of 2026 V.Regunathan S/o. R.V.Varadharajan, No.27, Sree Apartment, Flat X, Kamaraj Avenue 1st Street, Adayar, Chennai 600 020. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police Dindigul District. Dindigul 624001. 2. The Station House Officer, Kannivadi Police Station, Kannivadi, Dindigul District 624705. 3. K.Ramar S/o. Krishnasamy Gounder, T.Pannaipatty Po., Kannivadi Via, Dindigul 624 705 ..... Respondents. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the 2nd Respondent to execute the Bailable Warrant and to produce the 3rd respondent before the III Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town, Chennai in relating to the STC No.2134 of 2025, so as to enable the petitioner/complainant to get the justice with in the stipulated time fixed by this Honble Court and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render Justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 23105 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Thirupathi Raj For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu, (Crl.Side) for R1 and R2 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to execute the Bailable Warrant and to produce the 3rd respondent before the III Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town, Chennai in relating to the STC No.2134 of 2025. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court. 3. A perusal of the records revealed that the petitioner has lodged a complaint as against the second respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and the same has been taken cognizance by the trial Court in STC No.2134 of 2025. After receipt of summons, the third respondent failed to appear before the trial Court. Hence, the trial Court has issued Bailable Warrant as against the third respondent and it is pending on the file of the second respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 23105 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by either side, this Court directs the second respondent to execute the bailable warrant issued as against the third respondent within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the warrant from the trial court. Further, the petitioner is also directed to cooperate with the second respondent while executing the Bailable Warrant as against the third respondent by furnishing correct address of the third respondent. 5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of . 19-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Vv To 1. The III Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town, Chennai 2. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. Dindigul 624001. 3. The Station House Officer, Kannivadi Police Station, Kannivadi, Dindigul District 624705. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 23105 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. Vv CRL OP No. 23105 of 2026 19-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis