Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6011 (BOM)

AMIT MADHUKAR BHOGLE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/2806/2026 · 2026-08-25

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

H.C.SHIV 61.w2806.26.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2806 OF 2026 Amit Madhukar Bhogle ...Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent _____________ Mr. Priyal Sarda i/b Pratik Deshmukh for the Applicant. Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent. Mr. Dharmapal Bansode, ACP, Crime Branch Unit-7 present. _____________ CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATED : 25th AUGUST, 2026 P.C. :- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. On earlier occasion, this Court declined to release the Applicant on bail on merits and also for having criminal antecedents. The Applicant has following antecedents :- Sr. No. Case Details Provisions Status 1. MCOC Spl. Case No.9/2015 (Session Court, Greater Mumbai)C.R.No.314/2013 in Bhandup PS u/s. 302, 307, 342, 452 r/w 34 & 506-II r/w 120B of IPC and u/s 3/25, 3/27 of Arms Act and u/s 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(4) of MCOC Act. Acquitted on 27.03.2026 2. Session Case 75/2008 a/w 406/2008 (Session Court, Gr.Mumbai) CR-99/2007 at DCB CID u/s. 302, 307 r/w 34 of IPC & section 3 r/w 25 r/w 7, r/w 27 of the Arms Act Acquitted on 29.09.2017 3. Police Warrant PW/50/2008 (Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, u/s 379, 34 of IPC Acquitted on 22.03.2019 1/3 HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2026.09.02 11:37:12 +0300 H.C.SHIV 61.w2806.26.doc Vikhroli) CR-297/2007 in Parksite PS 4. Police Warrant PW/267/2007 JMFC Mulund CR-85/2007 at Bhandup P.S. u/s 143, 147, 149, 324 of IPC & U/s 37-1(a), 135 of Regional and Town Planning Act. Acquitted on 04.03.2013 5. Session Case 566/2009 Session Court Gr.Bombay CR-170/2009 at Bhandup PS u/s 147, 148, 302 r/w 149 of IPC Acquitted on 23.02.2010 6. Police Case PS/705/2018 JMFC Mulund CR-56/2018 Bhandup PS. u/s 3, 4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act For appearance (Charge not framed) 7. Session Case 399/2023 Addl. Session Court, Belapur CR-350/2019 at Rabale PS u/s 307, 143, 144, 148,149, 120B Charged not Framed 8. Police Case PW/238/2011 JMFC Mulund CR- 402/2010 at Bhandup PS u/s. 3, 25 Arms Act For hearing (Charge not framed) 9. CR 222 of 2007 at Ulhasnagar PS u/s 307, 34 of IPC a/w Section 3, 25(1) Arms Act 10. CR No.244 of 2007 at Vikroli PS u/s. 307, 302, 34 of IPC a/w Section 3, 25 of Arms Act 11. CR No.08 of 2008 at Goregaon PS u/s 3, 25 of Arms Act a/w 37(1), (a), 135 Regional and Town Planning Act 12. CR No.13 of 2011 at Unit 7, Crime Branch, Mumbai. u/s 3, 25 of Arms Act 13. CR No.89 of 2021 at Unit 7, Crime Branch, Mumbai u/s 302, 326, 342, 143, 144, 148, 149, 506, 120B, 34 of IPC a/w Section 37(1)(a), 135 of Maharashtra Police Act a/w Sec. 3, 25 & 4, 25 of Arms Act 14. CR 280 of 2003 at Bhandup PS u/s 302 of IPC 2/3 H.C.SHIV 61.w2806.26.doc 3. The aforesaid chart clearly indicates that the Applicant is majorly involved in serious bodily offences. Therefore, if the Applicant is released on bail on the ground of parity, there is a possibility of him committing similar offence. Therefore, I am not inclined to consider this Application favorably on the ground of parity. As a result, the Application is liable to be rejected and is rejected, accordingly. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) 3/3