IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13901 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2024 Thana- ALIPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Sandeep Kumar @ Dablu, son of Prashidh Prasad @ Prasidha Kumar Prasad Resident of Village- Sadopur, Po- Alipur Sadopur, Ps- Alipur, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 27-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 74, 77, 78(2), 79, 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 66(E), 67(A) of the I.T. Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that on 12.12.2024 the daughter of informant got an obscene photo on her phone which got deleted and then on 15.12.2024, when informant opened the door, he found obscene posters of his daughter and one Sonali Kumari and other girls pasted on door. On inquiry they got to know that petitioner and other accused, printed obscene photographs and pasted at public places. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13901 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the petitioner, in the FIR is totally false fabricated and concocted. It is further submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner for defaming the family of the informant by printing and circulating picture rather there is the picture of the victim along with the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner is also victim and his objectionable picture with the daughter of the informant is circulated and accordingly no case is made out against the petitioner. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that there is direct allegation of circulating and posting nude photos of victim along with himself against the petitioner. 6. Considering the nature and gravity of allegation, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. khushbu/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T