Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6009 (CAL)

SOHAIL QURAISHI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/4432/2025 · 2026-02-02

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

02.02.2026 Sl. No. 17 AMR Ct.No.28 CRM(A) 4432 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In the matter of : Sohail Quraishi .... Petitioner Mr. Rishabh Ahmad Khan Mr. Kiron Sk. Mr. Sayed Hossain Mr. Jamiruddin Sk. …for the Petitioner Md. Adil Badr, Jr. Govt. Adv. Mr. Nirupam Dhali …for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the dispute is purely civil in nature. The brother of the petitioner was granted bail. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that the petitioner had been absconding since the registration of the FIR in February, 2024. He is the principal accused in this case. He forged a power of attorney in his favour and thereafter sold properties to his own brother and to others. He also brought another person to impersonate the owner of the properties. 2 Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)