[2026:RJ-JP:15976] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6134/2025 1. Mukesh Marvada S/o Shri Bhagirath, R/o Savatsar, Gandhinagar, Kishangarh, Gandhinagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 2. Chhagan S/o Shri Bhagirath, R/o Savatsar, Gandhinagar, Kishangarh, Gandhinagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. Raju S/o Shri Bhagirath, R/o Savatsar, Gandhinagar, Kishangarh, Gandhinagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 4. Raju Chandiwal S/o Ramkishan, R/o Savatsar, Gandhinagar, Kishangarh, Gandhinagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ---Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Bhivaram Jat S/o Ratanlal, R/o Ghasawa Ki Dhani, Surssura, Rupangarh, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. Raju S/o Harnath, R/o Rodawas, Tehsil Pushkar, District Ajmer. 4. Pukhraj S/o Manglram, R/o Jatli, Tehsil Ajmer, District Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimany Singh Sandu, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 16/04/2026 ;g ;kfpdk /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk&xka/kh uxj] ftyk&vtesj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&189@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 115¼2½] 126¼2½ ch-,u-,l- dks fujLr djus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA [2026:RJ-JP:15976] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6134/2025] fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k rFkk fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh@ihfMr@vkgrx.k }kjk la;qDr :i ls ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd i{kdkjksa ds chp esa vkilh LoSfPNd lgefr ds vk/kkj ij jkthukek gks pqdk gSA nksuksa i{kksa ds chp lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k gSa] vijk/k t?kU; o xaHkhj izd`fr dk ugha gS] vr% mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ o mlds vk/kkj ij lafLFkr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks vikLr fd;k tkosA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk fof/k&lEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA muds }kjk rF;kRed fjiksVZ izLrqr dh x;h] ftlds lkFk iqfyl ds le{k vfHk;qDrx.k o vkgrx.k@ihfMr@ifjoknh }kjk izLrqr jkthukes dks rLnhd dj izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftls vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkrk gSA orZeku ekeys esa vijk/k xaHkhj o t?kU; izd`fr dk ugha gSA i{kdkjku~ ds e/; lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k LFkkfir gks pqds gSa] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vuqla/kku vFkok vfHk;kstu dks fujUrj j[ks tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gS] vr% ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fu.kZ; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. State of Punjab & Anr. 2012(10) SCC 303 esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj gksdj mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ij ntZ vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSA ifj.kker% ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk ;kphx.k ds fo:) iqfyl Fkkuk&xka/kh uxj] ftyk&vtesj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&189@2025 dh lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh mijksDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT /123 (S)