[2026:RJ-JP:11926] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 419/2026 1. Smt. Mausam Daughter Of Shri Ram Kuvanar, Wife Of Shri Chhagan Lal, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 4, Dhani Kolikala, Shyampura, Tehsil Patan, District Sikar. At Present Resident Of Dhani Rayakanala, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Doonga Ki Nangal, Po Doonga Ki Nangal, District Sikar (Raj.) 2. Chhagan Lal Son Of Shri Pitram, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Dhani Rayakanala, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Doonga Ki Nangal, Po Doonga Ki Nangal, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Superintendent Of Police, Sikar, District Sikar (Raj.) 4. Superintendent Of Police, Kotputli Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) 5. S.h.o. Police Station Patan, District Sikar (Raj.) 6. S.h.o. Police Station Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) 7. Ram Kuvanar Gurjar Son Of Unknown, Resident Of Ward No. 4, Dhani Kolikala, Shyampura, Tehsil Patan, District Sikar (Raj.) 8. Ratiram Gurjar Son Of Unknown, Resident Of Ward No. 4, Dhani Kolikala, Shyampura, Tehsil Patan, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Dutt Mr. Balvendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 19/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. [2026:RJ-JP:11926] (2 of 2) [CRLW-419/2026] 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.7 & 8 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Mandir Trust, New Delhi on 06.03.2026. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.7 & 8 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.5-Station House Officer, Police Station Patan, District Sikar (Raj.) and respondent no.5 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /192