[2026:RJ-JP:12122] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2974/2026 M/s. Wonset Healthcare Pvt. Ltd, 10, Ramdwara Colony, Near Durgapura Railway Station, Jaipur, Rajasthan Through Its Director Radhesh Shrivastav ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Registrar Of Trademark, (Govt. Of India) Near Chanakyapuri Over Bridge, Ghatlodiya, Ahmedabad (Guj.) …..Respondent No.1 2. M/s. Verlen Labs Pvt. Ltd., Having Its Registered Office At - 9-65, Sri Devi Nagar Colony, R. L. Nagar, Rampally, Hyderabad - 501 301. Through Its Director / Representative ----Respondent No. For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta Mr. Mohit Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 23/03/2026 1. By filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner has made a limited prayer that the suitable directions may be issued to the respondent No.1 to proceed/dispose/decide the petitioner’s application No.5373357 filed on 16.03.2022 for registration of trademark. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted an application on 16.03.2022 for registration of trademark and same has not been decided so far even after passing of four years. [2026:RJ-JP:12122] (2 of 2) [CW-2974/2026] 3. Heard and considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Taking into consideration the material fact that the application filed by the petitioner for registration of trademark is pending with the respondent No.1 for last four years, this Court feels that the ends of justice would meet if directions are issued to the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the application submitted by the petitioner for registration of trademark, expeditiously. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.1 to decide the application filed by the petitioner on 16.03.2022 for registration of trademark, as soon as possible and preferably within a period of two months’ from the date of submitting a certified copy of this order. 6. The order passed by this Court does not mean that the application is to be allowed and, therefore, the respondent authority would consider and decide the application of the petitioner in accordance with law. 7. The stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /19