2026:JHHC:10614 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2459 of 2026 ----- Sushila Prasad, W/o Dr. Pramod Prasad R/o Vill- Yashodanagar Post- Gadra P.S. Chhota Govodnpur (East Singhbhum) Dist East Singhbhum, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Secretary of Information Technology, Department of Information Technology, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O.+P.S. Dhurwa, Dist Ranchi, Jharkhand 3.The Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, Reserve Bank of India, Kutchary Chowk, P.O. GPO, P.S. Lalpur, Dist Ranchi (Jharkhand) 4.The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Mango Banch, Dimna Road, P.o. Mango P.S. Mango, Dist Jamshedpur/ East Singbhum, Jharkhand 5.The Branch Manager, HDFC Bank, Bishtupur Branch, Mithila Moror Building, Main Road, Near ram Mandir, P.O. Bishtupur, P.S. Bishtupur, Dist. Jamshedpur/ East Singhbhum, Jharkhand … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Awanish Ranjan Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Prakash, AC to S.C.-VII …...... 02/ 15.04.2026: Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner has already availed the alternative efficacious remedy available to the petitioner, inspite of that she has approached this Court claiming compensation. 3. The petitioner has approached the authority by filing representation under Section 43(A) of the Information Technology Act for the same relief. 4. Considering the fact that the petitioner has approached the forum available to the petitioner and also the fact that to grant compensation, evidence has to be recorded and there will be complicated question of facts which needs to be addressed, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition, the same is dismissed. 5. Petitioner should pursue her application which she has filed before the appropriate authority. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 15th April, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 16/04/2026.