Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 60016 (MAD)

C.Krishnasamy, v. B.Subramani,

CMP/10194/2026 · 2026-08-20

Abdul Quddhose, R Rajesh Vivekananthan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP.No.10194 of 2026 in AS.SR.No.12623 of 2023 and A.S.No.1224 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. and R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN, J. The respondent has been duly served with notice in CMP.No.10194 of 2026, which has been filed to condone the delay of 28 days in filing the aforesaid appeal. The learned counsel for the respondent in the said CMP has not raised any objection for allowing the said CMP. We are also satisfied with the reasons contained in the affidavit filed in support of the said CMP as sufficient cause has been shown by the petitioner for condoning the delay of 28 days in filing the aforesaid appeal. Accordingly, CMP.No.10194 of 2026 is allowed as prayed for. Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for hearing along with A.S.No.1224 of 2025 on 15.09.2026. [AQJ] [RRVJ] 20.08.2026 rkm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis