On 07.03.2026, this Court had passed the following order: “The petitioner has filed the i Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.15 dated 15.01.2026 registered under Section 21(B) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Sirsa, District Sirsa. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case on the basis of disclosure statement of co accused, namely Ranjeet Singh @ Rana, from whom 6 gram 86 milligram of ‘heroin’ was recovered which is marginally above from the small quantity. He further disclosure statement of the co value in the eyes of law. He has placed reliance upon the judgment of Hon’ble Suprem State of Tamil Nadu : 2021(4) SCC 1. He further submits , this Court had passed the following order:- The petitioner has filed the instant petition under 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for anticipatory bail in FIR No.15 dated 15.01.2026 Section 21(B) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 at Police Station Sadar Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, submits the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated case on the basis of disclosure statement of co- Singh @ Rana, from whom 6 gram recovered which is marginally above from the small quantity. He further submits that disclosure statement of the co-accused has no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. He has placed reliance upon the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Tofan Singh Vs. 2021(4) SCC 1. He further submits PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.07 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and is ready and willing to join the investigation. Notice of motion. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, A.A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and seeks time to file status report. Adjourned to 07.05.2026 In the meanwhile, arrest of the petitioner shall remain stayed. He shall join the investigation and co-operate with the investigating agency and shall not leave country without prior permission of this Court.” 3. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Pawan Kumar affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 07.03.2026 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.07 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.