APHC010019082019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 73/2019 Between: 1. S.SYAM PRASAD, THUMMULURU POST AND VILLAGE, KOLLIPARA MANDALAM,GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHRIAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD, REP. BY ITS OFFICE ASSISTANT STATION ROAD ,TENALI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING AT AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O UDAYA KUMAR 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment dated 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.No.73 of 2019 Dated 22.07.2026 25.01.2019 passed in Crl.A.No.224 of 2016 by the learned IX Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tenali, confirming the conviction of the Petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for brevity, ‘the N.I.Act’) and the sentence of simple imprisonment for a period of six months. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the learned counsel for Respondent No.1, and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has already undergone the sentence of imprisonment imposed by the learned Appellate Court. In support of his contention, he has placed reliance upon the conviction certificates issued by the Superintendent, District Jail, Guntur, and the Superintendent, Sub-Jail, Tenali. 4. A perusal of the said conviction certificates reveals that the Petitioner has already undergone the sentence of imprisonment as confirmed by the learned Appellate Court. It is also pertinent to note that neither the learned Trial Court nor the learned Appellate Court imposed any fine or compensation upon the Petitioner. Therefore, nothing further survives for adjudication in the present Criminal Revision Case. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of, recording that the Petitioner has already undergone the sentence of imprisonment imposed upon him. 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.No.73 of 2019 Dated 22.07.2026 6. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date:22.07.2026 KMS 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.No.73 of 2019 Dated 22.07.2026 65 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 73/2019 Date: 22.07.2026 KMS