Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6001 (ALL)

ANURAG v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/31940/2026 · 2026-09-08

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31940 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.100 out of 318) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Mohd. Farukh Ansari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vindhya Vashini Prasad Rai, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.237 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 61(2) BNS and Section 66-D I.T. Act, Police Station Fatehganj West, District Bareilly, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. An amount of Rs.1,31,590/- is stated to have been transferred to the account of the applicant in three transactions. The allegations levelled against the applicant are per se false. He was never a member of any criminal gang involved in cyber fraud. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 12.7.2026. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and without Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vindhya Vashini Prasad Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anurag .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Anurag, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. September 9, 2026 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 31940 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad