Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5999 (MAD)

Nachiar Ammal (Died) K. Thiruvengadam (Died) 1. K. Damodharan v. T. Soundarajan

CMP(MD)/1106/2026 · 2026-03-17

P Vadamalai

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD) NOS. 1106, 1108, & 1109 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI CMP(MD) NOS. 1106, 1108, & 1109 of 2026 in AS(MD) NO. 12 of 2019 Nachiar Ammal (Died) K.Thiruvengadam (Died) 1.K.Damodharan 2.Kanagarethinam 3.T.Lakshmi 4.S.Krishnakumari (Died) 5.T.M.Shrinivasan 6.S.Preethi Petitioner(s) in all petitions Vs 1.T.Soundarajan 2.T.Narayanan 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 1106, 1108, & 1109 of 2026 3.D.Padmavathi 4.Valliammal Respondent(s) in all petitions For Petitioner(s) in all petitions : Mr.Ashok Kumar M, Advocate For Respondent(s) in all petitions : Mr.K.Prabhakar, Advocate for R4 Common Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed to condone the delay of 1275 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 4th appellant, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 4th appellant, and to bring on record petitioner Nos.5 & 6 as the legal representatives of the deceased 4th appellant and rank them as appellant Nos.5 & 6 in the Appeal Suit in A.S.(MD)No.12 of 2019 on the file of this Court. COMMON ORDER These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 1275 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 4th appellant, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 4th appellant, and to bring on record petitioner Nos.5 & 6 as the legal representatives of the deceased 4th appellant and rank them as appellant Nos.5 & 6 in the Appeal Suit in A.S.(MD)No.12 of 2019 on the file of this Court. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 1106, 1108, & 1109 of 2026 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the common affidavit filed in support of these petitions. 3. The learned counsel for the 4th respondent has not raised any objection to allow these petitions. 4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed. 17-03-2026 (1/2) Note : The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the appeal memorandum. mkn 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 1106, 1108, & 1109 of 2026 P.VADAMALAI, J. mkn CMP(MD) NOS. 1106, 1108, & 1109 of 2026 in AS(MD) NO. 12 of 2019 17.03.2026 (1/2) 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis