Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5998 (KAR)

SANJAY SABARAD v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.A/2500/2025 · 2026-03-11

M G S Kamal

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15144 CRL.A No. 2500 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2500 OF 2025 (KPIDFE) BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY SABARAD C/O BASAPPA SABARAD AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/A NO.47/1, 2ND FLOOR, AYYAPPA NILAYA, 11TH CROSS 9TH MAIN, AVALAHALLI GIRINAGAR, 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU-560085 2. PRASHANT TUKARAM BHOR S/O TUKARAM AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/A WARD NO-09, SANGALIKAR GALLI, JAMKHANDI TALUK, JAMKHANDI, BAGALKOT-587301 3. MUDASSAMAWAJ KHADRI S/O MOHAMMED JAFFAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/A KHB COLONY MANTOOR ROAD, MUDHOL, BAGALKOT, KARNATAKA PIN-587313 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. G.M. SHARATHKUMAR, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15144 CRL.A No. 2500 of 2025 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BY RMC YARD PS PEENYA SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560058 2. THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT CID HEAD QUARTERS, NO.1, CARLTON HOUSE, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. LAKSHMAN, HCGP ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) ------ THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 16 OF KPIDFE ACT PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE APPELLANTS ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN CR.NO.239/2023 REGISTERED BY RESPONDENT RMC YARD P.S., FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 9 OF KPID ACT, U/S 406,420 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF 3rd ACMM COURT, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15144 CRL.A No. 2500 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Learned counsel for the appellants files a Memo of even date which reads as under : "The appellants respectfully submits to withdraw the present appeal as they have given their statement before the complainant police and there is no apprehension of arrest. Hence, this memo may be considered and the appellants may be permitted to withdraw the appeal as not pressed with liberty to file fresh appeal in the interest of justice." 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. Appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as sought for. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29