REV.APPL.No.193 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL REV.APPL No.193 of 2026 and C.M.P.No.22442 of 2026 Arkay Energy (rameswaram) Private Limited Rep by its Authorized Signatory C.T. Vasan, Legal Manager, No.20, Old No.129, Chamiers Road Nandanam, Chennai 035. ..Applicant Vs Tidel Park Limited Rep by its Managing Director, B. Elangovan, No.4, Rajiv Gandhi Road, Taramani, Chennai 113. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 & 2 r/w Section 114 of CPC to review and recall the impugned order dated 18-03-2024 passed in OSA (CAD).No.157 of 2023. For Applicant(s): Mr.S.P.Sudharshan For Mr.Anirudh Krishnan ***** O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The present Review Application has been filed to review and recall the impugned order dated 18.03.2024 passed in OSA (CAD) No.157 of 2023. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APPL.No.193 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Perusal of grounds raised in Review Application would show that Applicant raised grounds of wrong application of mind to facts and mischaracterization of issues. Ignorance of binding precedent is also raised as a ground. Ignorance of vital evidence and non- consideration of material issues is also a ground raised. The manner in which grounds raised by Review Applicant cannot be appreciated, but to be deprecated. 3. Stand of Review Applicant that there is an ignorance of binding precedent is unwarranted usage of language in the Review Application. Review Applicant has made an attempt to re-adjudicate merits relating to facts. Non consideration of certain documents or appreciation of facts would not constitute a ground to review the order passed by this Court. 4. This Court has elaborately considered the facts as placed between parties and issues were answered. Therefore, grounds raised relating to facts cannot be re-appreciated. Scope of review cannot be expanded. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APPL.No.193 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. In view of the fact that Review Applicant has not established any error apparent warranting exercise of review jurisdiction, the present Review Application is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (P.D.B.,J.) 13-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No AR https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APPL.No.193 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. AND P.DHANABAL,J. AR REV.APPL No.193 of 2026 13-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis