Sanjay v. The State Rep by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/23734/2026 · 2026-08-24
N Ramesh
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 59974 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 59974 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 23734 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH CRL OP No. 23734 of 2026
1. Sanjay
2. Iyyappan ..Petitioners Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police PEW-Washermenpet Police Station, Chennai. ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners/Accused on bail in Crime No.62 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners: Mr.S.Kasirajan for T.Subas Chandira Boss For Respondent: Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.07.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B), & 29(1) of NDPS Act in Crime No.62 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 23734 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners were found to be in possession of 7.300 kg of ganja. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and that they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioners. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioners have been incarcerated since 11.07.2026. He further submitted that the petitioners have three previous cases out of which one is similar in nature. However, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioners. 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); considering the totality of the circumstances and upon the fact that the quantity involved is https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 23734 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 an intermediate quantity and though the petitioners have three previous cases, considering the period of incarceration of the petitioners since 04.07.2026, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners subject to certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Special EC& NDPS Court at Chennai, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019'].
The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., and 05.00 p.m until further orders; [c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 23734 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 24-08-2026 SHL Note:
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this
order in the Official Website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To:
1. The Principal Special EC& NDPS Court at Chennai
2. The Puzhal Prison-II.
3. The Inspector of Police, Pew-Washermenpet Police Station, Chennai.
4. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 23734 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 N.RAMESH J. SHL CRL OP No. 23734 of 2026 24-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis