- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12880-DB RFA No. 589 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 589 OF 2012 (MON) BETWEEN: 1. SMT KOLERA LEELA APPANNA WIFE OF THE LATE SRI KOLERA A APPANNA (DODANNA) AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 2. SMT NEELAMMA APPANNA DAUGHTER OF THE LATE S RI KOLERA A APPANNA (DODANNA) AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 3. SRI KEERTHAN APPANNA SON OF THE LATE SRI KOLERA A APPANNA (DODANNA) AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 4. SRI K SHAKTHI APPANNA SON OF THE LATE SRI KOLERA A APPANNA (DODANNA) AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS ALL COFFE PLANTERS, RESIDING AT HANUMANTHA ESTATE ALSO KNOWN AS DADA ESTATE, K BADAGA VILLAGE KUTTA, SRIMANGALA NAD, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12880-DB RFA No. 589 of 2012 VIRAJPET TALUK, KODAGU DIST. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. R I D'SA AND SMT. SUNITHA H SINGH, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI AJJAMADA HARRY SON OF SRI CHITTIAPPA BUSINESSMAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS SRI RAMA TRADERS, KURCHI VILLAGE& POST, SRIMANGALA-571217 VIRAJPET TALUK, KODAGU DIST 2. SRI MACHAMADA SUMANTH SON OF THE LATE SRI NANJAPPA BUSINESSMAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS SRI RAMA TRADERS, T SHETTIGERI VILLAGE SRIMANGALA 571 217 KODAGU …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SACHIN B.S, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:17.12.2011 PASSED IN O.S.14/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, VIRAJPET, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12880-DB RFA No. 589 of 2012 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) Despite the matter being called out twice, neither is the learned counsel for the appellants is present nor have the translated copies of the documents been filed, despite the appellant being granted time twice. It appears that the appellants are not interested to press the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Interim order if any, stands vacated. All pending applications stand disposed of. SD/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30