Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 59939 (MAD)

Vinu v. The State Rep by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/21575/2026 · 2026-08-06

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 21575 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 21575 of 2026 1. Vinu D.No.55/77, Poo mariammankoil back side,South Ukkadam,Coimbatore-641001Now at Site No.37,Velus Avenue, SNMV College,Near Government Music College,Malumichampatty,Coimbatore 2. Vishnu S/o.Karuppusamy, D.No.55/77, Poo Mariammankoil back Side, South Ukkadam, Coimbatore-641001. Now at Site No.37, Velus Avenue, SNMV College, Near Government Music College, Malumichampatty, Coimbatore - 641050. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police Chettipalayam Police Station, Coimbatore District. Crime No.276 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on Anticipatory Bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.276 of 2026 dated 19.07.2026 on the file of Chettipalayam Police Station, Coimbatore District. For Petitioner(s): MR. Lakshminarayana A For Respondent(s): MS.R.S.INDIRA, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21575 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 118(2), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.276 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners under the influence of alcohol abused the defacto complainant and his friends, when the same was questioned by thim, they asaulted him by using hands and stones and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and that they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that in the alleged occurrence, that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the first petitioner/A1 has four previous cases and the second petitioner/A2 has five previous cases pending against them. He further submitted that the defacto complainant was admitted in the hospital on 19.07.2026 and discharged on https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21575 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 22.07.2026. However, she opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. From the above factual position, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioners, by misusing the liberty, keeps on continuing the offences without mending themselves. Hence the petitioners does not deserve anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 06-08-2026 DRL To 1.The Inspector of Police Chettipalayam Police Station, Coimbatore District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21575 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 21575 of 2026 06-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis