Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 59917 (MAD)

M.Ravanan @ Ravi Vannana and 3 others v. M/S Srinidhi Constructions

A/2753/2026 · 2026-08-13

K Govindarajan Thilakavadi

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 2753 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI A No. 2753 of 2026 in CS NO. 212 OF 2022 1. M.Ravanan @ Ravi Vannana 2. R.Vishwajith Dev 3. R.Shyam Surender 4. R.Devanand ..Applicants Vs M/S Srinidhi Constructions, Represented by its partner Mr.M.S.Ravindra Babu and Mr.E.Sunil Kumar, Having Office at Plot No.138, 6th Main Road, B Block, Thanikachalam Nagar, Chennai 600 110. ..Respondent A No. 2753 of 2026 To condone the delay of 927 days in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree dated 25/08/2023 passed in C.S.No.212 of 2022 on the file of this Honble Court. For Applicant(s): No Appearance For Respondent(s): Ms. R. V. Gayatri https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 2753 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Order This Court, by order dated 30.07.2026, directed the applicants as follows: “Accordingly, the 927 days delay is condoned, subject to the applicants paying costs of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the respondent / plaintiff within a period of two weeks of the date of this order. Further, the applicants are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupess ten lakhs only) to the credit of the suit within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Upon proof of payment, the Registry shall number the application filed under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, if it is otherwise in order, and place it before the Court. In the event of non-payment within the stipulated time, this application shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.” 2. The matter is listed today under the caption “for reporting compliance”. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on the side of the applicants. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent/plaintiff submitted that the applicants had not paid the costs to the plaintiff as directed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 2753 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 3. Since there is no representation on the side of the applicants and no application was filed for extension of time, the above application stands dismissed. 13-08-2026 BGA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 2753 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI J. BGA A No. 2753 of 2026 in CS NO. 212 OF 2022 13-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis