WP No. 32163 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 32163 of 2026 M. Chakravarthi S/o. Murugesan, No.114, Main Road, Atkonda Natham Village, and post, Katumannarkoil Taluk, Cuddalore District -608 305 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector O/o. District Collectorate, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Chidambaram, Cuddalore District. 608 001 3. The Tahsildar, Kattumannarkoil, Cuddalore District. 4. Thangasamy S/o. Poorasamy, Gunavasal Village, Omampuliyur Post, Kattumannarkoil Taluk, Cuddalore District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.07.2026, with regard to cancel the fraudulent computer Patta standing in the name of the 4th Respondent in respect https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32163 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 of Survey No.26/1, 26/5C, 21/1B, 20/1D, 112/4, (Patta No.97), 26/1A, and 27/2 at Omampuliyur Village, Kattumannarkoil Taluk Cuddalore District. For Petitioner(s): Mr. R.Srinivasarao For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Elayaraj Kumar, SGP for R1 to 3 Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.07.2026. 2. Mr.P.Elayaraj Kumar, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 18.07.2026 before the respondents, requesting them to cancel the fraudulent computer patta, standing in the name of 4th respondent in respect of the subject property. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32163 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.07.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 14-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To 1. The District Collector O/o. District Collectorate, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32163 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Chidambaram, Cuddalore District. 608 001 3. The Tahsildar, Kattumannarkoil, Cuddalore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32163 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 32163 of 2026 14-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis