Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14271 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite the fact that the JCB vehicle bearing Registration No. UP91AT3448 was purchased by him in an auction, the respondent authority has neither issued the registration certificate nor transferred the registration of the said vehicle in the name of the petitioner. In this regard, the petitioner has submitted several representations before the respondent authority, but no heed has been paid to his request and the grievance of the petitioner remains unattended.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.2-Regional Transport Officer, Hamirpur within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. September 9, 2026 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abdul Mateen Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Riyaj Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad