HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 554/2026 CM No. 1297/2026 M/s Shakti Warehouse …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Siddhant Gupta, Advocate Vs UT of J&K & Ors .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Dewakar Sharma, Dy AG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER (06.03.2026) 01. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners at length and perused the record. 02. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied, in case the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to treat the instant writ petition as representation and to accord due consideration to the same within some reasonable time, to which, Mr. Dewakar Sharma, learned Dy AG, has no serious objection. 03. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of, at the threshold, with a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner as projected in the instant petition by treating this writ petition as representation and take a decision thereon strictly under rules and as per law and pass a consideration order within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order alongwith complete set of writ petition are made available to the said respondents. S. No. 203 2 WP(C) No. 554/2026 04. It is also made clear that in case, the petitioner intends to file any other material before the respondents 2 and 3, the same can be filed within the aforesaid period alongwith instant writ petition. The order of consideration, which is likely to be passed, be forwarded to the petitioners through registered post. 01. Disposed of, as above alongwith connected application. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 06.03.2026 Vijay Vijay Kumar 2026.02.10 07:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document