Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5989 (UTT)

DHYAN SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1365/2026 · 2026-05-27

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS Nos.1366, 1360, 1361 & 1365 all of the year 2026 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Yogesh Pandey, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at bar that he wants to withdraw all these writ petitions in view of subsequent development with liberty to file fresh. 4. Accordingly, all the aforesaid writ petitions are hereby dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 27.05.2026 AK