- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16832 RPFC No. 132 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.132 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI. HARISH S S/O G. SHIVARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/A NO.14/4, 7TH CROSS GAYATHRI LAYOUT, DEVASANDRA, K.R PURAM, BANGALORE-560 036. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR. T.R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT) SRI. HARISH S, PETITIONER (ABSENT) AND: SMT. ASHWINI @ LALITHA. N W/O HARISH S. AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS NO.136, 2ND MAIN ROAD 5TH CROSS, 1ST STAGE VIJAYANAGAR MYSURU-570 017. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. HARIPRASAD M.B.,ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26.04.2022 PASSED IN CRL.MIS.618/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE. Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16832 RPFC No. 132 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo of retirement dated 04.02.2025, stating that the petitioner has neither been responding to the counsel’s telephone calls nor approached his office for further instructions. It is further stated that the learned counsel has sent an intimation letter to the petitioner, cautioning him about filing retirement memo, through RPAD vide receipt No.RK715049755IN, to which the petitioner has not responded. 3. In view of the above, the memo of retirement filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted, and he is permitted to retire from this case. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16832 RPFC No. 132 of 2022 4. It appears that, till date, the petitioner has not taken any steps to engage any other counsel to prosecute the case, despite having received intimation from the earlier counsel regarding his retirement. In view of the same, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2