[2026:JHHC:10725] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 632 of 2026 ------ Vidhit Singh @ Bidhit Singh, aged about 42 years s/o Late- Maheshwar Singh, r/o Village- Utaki, PO & PS – Patan, District- Palamau. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, Addl.P.P. Mr. Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak, Advocate ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-15-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Patan P.S. Case No. 169 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 140(1) and 103(1) r/w 3(5) of B.N.S. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner abducted Jaishankar Thakur and committed his murder in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused persons, he has been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is known to the informant as both of them belong to the same village. It is also submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner. It is then submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It is submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.10.2025 as is evident from para-20 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Patan P.S. Case No. 169 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 15.04.2026 Vedanti/