Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5981 (GAU)

DR KANGKAN PATHAK v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP(C)/2399/2026 · 2026-05-10

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010088812026 2026:GAU-AS:6462 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2399/2026 DR KANGKAN PATHAK S/O-OF LATE BISWAMBHAR PATHAK, RESIDENT OF KALIBARI TINIALI, NEAR OLD BAN STAGE, TEZPUR, SONITPUR-784001, ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA , REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NIRMAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHL110011. 2:THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA CUM CHAIRMAN EXECUTIVE COUNCIL LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH TEZPUR NIRMAN BHAWAN NEW DELHI-110011. 3:THE DIRECTOR LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR PIN784001 ASSAM. 4:THE OSD DEPUTY DIRECTOR Page No.# 2/3 LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR PIN784001 ASSAM. 5:THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER I/C LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR PIN784001 ASSAM. 6:DR JYOTI HAZARIKA LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH QRT E5/TYPE VI LGBRIMH CAMPUS TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR PIN 784001 ASSAM. 7:DR HEMANTA DUTTA LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH QRT 19/TYPE VI LGBRIMH CAMPUS TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR PIN-784001 ASSAM. 8:SONIA P DEURI W/O DR. SAILENDRA KUMAR DEURI RESIDENT OF NIRIBILI KOLIBARI NEAR TEZPUR CENTRAL JAIL TEZPUR SONITPUR ASSA 78400 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR BHARGAV DAS, MR. M SARMA,MR. K P PATHAK,MR. C PAUL,MS. SANSKRITI BARUA,MS T WAPANGLA Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 11-05-2026 Mr. K. P. Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh. Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondent, is present. Prayer for withdrawal is accepted. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with a liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant