G Sriteja and another,W/o.Dr.A.V.Kalyan Adithya v. Dr.Abinaya Ganeshanathan and another
OA/438/2026 · 2026-08-19
K Kumaresh Babu
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 59756 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 59756 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
OA Nos. 438 to 440 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU OA Nos. 438 to 440 of 2026
1. G Sriteja and another,W/o.Dr.A.V.Kalyan Adithya Door No 49 53-9/4/2, B.S. Layout, 4th Town Police Road, Above Union Bank of India, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh 530013. 2. Dr AV Kalyan Adithya Door No. 49-53-9/4/2, B.S. Layout, 4th Town Police Road, Above Union Bank of India, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh 530013. ..Applicants in all applications Vs
1. Dr.Abinaya Ganeshanathan and another D/o.Dr.Ganeshanathan,
2. R. Geetha W.o.Dr.Ganeshanathan ..Respondents in all applications Prayer in O.A.No.438 of 2026: Original Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules read with Section 9(1) (II) (D) & (E) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to pass an order of ad interim injunction restraining the Respondents / Defendants, their men, agents, servants representatives, assigns or anyperson claiming through or under them, from in any manner removing, dismantling, altering, defacing, obscuring, substituting, or otherwise interfering with the existing sign boards, name boards, display https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OA Nos. 438 to 440 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 boards, hoardings, digital displays, branding materials, trade dress, logos, trademarks, or any other visual identifiers bearing the plaintiffs registered trade mark Dr.Sritejas Skin Med or any mark identical with or deceptively similar thereto presently installed or displayed at the place of business is situated at Ground Floor No.27, Vasu st, Kilpauk, ch-10,and from replacing the same with any other name, mark or device , so as to preserve the status quo and prevent dilution, misappropriation or damage to the plaintiffs goodwill and proprietary rights.
Prayer in O.A.No.439 of 2026: Original Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules read with Section 9(1) (II) (D) & (E) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to pass an order of ad interim injunction restraining the Respondents their servants, agents, representatives, partners, employees, and all persons claiming through or under her from in any manner using the plaintiffs registered trade mark “Dr.Sriteja’s Skin Med” or any other identical or deceptively similar mark in respect of dermatology, cosmetology or allied services at the place of business is situated at Ground Floor, No.27, Vasu St, Kilpauk, Chennai-600010 whether online or offline Prayer in O.A.No.440 of 2026: Original Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules read with Section 9(1) (II) (D) & (E) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to pass an order of ad interim injunction restraining the Respondents their servants, agents, representatives, partners, employees, and all persons claiming through or under her from operating, running, managing or in any manner carrying on whether directly or indirectly dermatology, cosmetology skin care salon, spa or allied clinic or business from the clinic situated at Ground Floor, No.27, Vasu St, Kilpauk, Chennai-600010 or from any other premises in the immediate vicinity or neighbourhood thereof under the Applicants trade mark https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OA Nos. 438 to 440 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 For Applicants : [in all applications] Mr.B.Leelesh Sundaram for M/s. Nathan and Associates For Respondents : [in all applications] Mr..P.Kumanan COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the parties had arrived at a compromise and in that regard, he had been instructed to withdraw these applications and to also work out the compromise in the pending suit, COS.No.6 of 2026, which is pending on the file of the Special Court for Trial and Disposal of Commercial Cases at Visakhapatnam. 2. The said request was made by the learned counsel appearing for the applicants through video conferencing is recorded. 3. Recording the same, these applications stand dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 19-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MP https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OA Nos. 438 to 440 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 K.KUMARESH BABU J. mp OA Nos. 438 to 440 of 2026 19-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis