1 2026:CGHC:15540 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3086 of 2022 1 - Smt. Kanti Karsh Wd/o Late Ramanand Karsh, Aged About 65 Years R/o Dhobi Para, Chandani Chowk, Raigarh,, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Savitri Karsh D/o Late Ramanand Karsh, Aged About 32 Years R/o Dhobi Para, Chandani Chowk, Raigarh,, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners Versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Corporation Limited (Successor Of Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board), Through Its Managing Director, Daganiya, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Executive Director, (Bilaspur Region) C.S.P.D.C.L.,, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Superintending Engineer (O And M) Division, CSPDCL, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Executive Engineer, (O And M) Division, CSPDCL, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Suraj Karsh S/o Late Ramanand Karsh, Aged About 42 Years Posted At CSPDCL Office, Bilha, Tahsil - Bilha, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Ruchika Agrawal, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 4 For Respondent No. 5 : : Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate Ms. Tejaswi Mandavi, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Vijay K. Deshmukh, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 06/04/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.07 12:27:02 +0530 2 “10.1 This Hon’ble Court be pleased to call for the records pertaining to the case of the petitioners from the respondent concerned for its kind perusal. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, may be pleased to pass an order directing the respondent authorities to grant compassionate appointment to other dependent (Petitioner No. 2) of the deceased employee by cancelling the appointment of respondent No. 5 made on compassionate ground. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass an order directing the respondent authorities to deduct 50% amount from the salary of respondent No. 5 and pay the same to the petitioner No. 1 so that she may lead hear life with dignity and without any difficulty. 10.4 Cost of the proceedings. 10.5 Any other writs and directions that may be deemed fit and just in the facts & circumstances of the case.” 2. Ms. Ruchika Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the matter has already been settled between the parties and nothing survives for adjudication. 3. Taking into consideration the submission made by Ms. Ruchika Agrawal, this petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti