Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5971 (UTT)

JAGRAM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1575/2026 · 2026-05-29

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No.1575 of 2026 Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Subhash Chand Burman, learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.S. Koranga, learned B.H. for the State. 3. Petitioner seeks issuance of a direction to respondent no.2 to decide representation dated 28.03.2026 (Annexure No.2) submitted by petitioner as early as possible. 4. From a perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, and the documents, annexed therewith, it appears that there is some dispute with regard to the demarcation of the property recorded in the name of petitioner vis-à-vis to respondent no.3. The petitioner, instead of moving an appropriate application before the competent authority for demarcation of his property, has directly come up before this Court in the present writ petition. 4. The relief sought for in this writ petition by the petitioner cannot be granted by this Court. 5. No case for interference is made out. The petition is dismissed at the threshold itself. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 29.05.2026 R.Dang