BHARAT ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
MCC/267/2026 · 2026-03-17
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 597 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 597 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:12881
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 267 of 2026 Bharat Aluminium Company Limited Through Chief Executive Officer, Balco Nagar, District - Korba Chhattisgarh,
... Applicant versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Industries And Commerce, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. The Joint Director State Investment Promotion Board, Shastri Chowk, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. The Collector District - Korba, Chhattisgarh.
4. Municipal Corporation Korba Through Commissioner, District - Korba, Chhattisgarh
5. Chhattisgarh State Pollution Control Board Through its Secretary, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh
6. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Environment And Forest, Paryavaran Bhawan, Lodhi Road, New Delhi
7. Vandana Soni W/o Shri Lal Bahadur Soni Aged About 52 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, P.S. - Balco Nagar, District -Korba Chhattisgarh
... Non-Applicant(s) For Applicant
: Mr. Sharad Mishra, Advocate For State : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Government Advocate For Non-Applicant No. 4 : Mr. Anuroop Panda, Advocate For Non-Applicant No. 7 : Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 18.03
.2026
1. Heard on application for modification of order dated 12.12.2025 passed in WPC No. 2724 of 2016.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that observations made in SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.03.18 16:43:06 +0530
2 para 3 of the order passed in WPC No. 2724 of 2016 are contrary to the
facts enumerated in the return filed by Bharat Aluminium Company Limited.
3. Perusal of the order would show that Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate appeared for BALCO and on his presence the order was passed. I do not find any good ground to modify the order passed in WPC No. 2724 of 2016, accordingly, MCC is dismissed. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge $iddhant